How far back can you test BND? To Jan 1987, with VBMFX
What you'd have missed
- BND's own data starts in May 2007; VBMFX extends it to Jan 1987, 20.3 more years.
- Its own history misses the 1987 crash, the 1998 LTCM sell-off and the 2000–02 dot-com bear.
- Its worst drawdown, -17.3% (Jul 2020–Oct 2022), is already inside the ETF's own history; the extension does not change the worst case.
- AGG is extended with the same VBMFX.
How the history is built
Solid bars are the months each fund contributes to the spliced series; the outline shows how far a proxy's own data runs. Each month uses the youngest fund that has data for it; returns are spliced, not prices (dividends reinvested via adjusted close).
How well each proxy tracked BND
| Proxy | Kind | Months contributed | Overlap with BND | Correlation | Tracking error | Tracking difference | Beta | Vol ratio | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VBMFXVanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund | mutual fund | Jan 1987–Apr 2007244 months | May 2007–Sep 2026233 months | 0.986 | 0.78% | -0.10% | 0.95 | 0.96 | Close |
Statistics are over the months a proxy and BND both have data. Tracking error is annualized; tracking difference is the annualized geometric gap (positive: the proxy earned more). Page grade: close, the worst grade among the proxies that contribute months.
BND's own history versus the extended history
| The ETF's own history | Proxy years only | Full extended history | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Window | May 2007 – Sep 202619.4 years | Jan 1987 – Apr 200720.3 years | Jan 1987 – Sep 202639.8 years |
| Growth of $10,000 | $17,138 | $39,910 | $68,396 |
| CAGR | 2.8% | 7.0% | 5.0% |
| Annualized volatility | 4.6% | 4.1% | 4.4% |
| Sharpe ratio (risk-free 0%) | 0.63 | 1.70 | 1.14 |
| Max drawdown | -17.3%Jul 2020 → Oct 2022; not yet recovered | -5.8%Feb 1987 → Sep 1987; recovered Jan 1988 | -17.3%Jul 2020 → Oct 2022; not yet recovered |
| Worst complete calendar year | 2022 (-13.1%) | 1994 (-2.6%) | 2022 (-13.1%) |
| Best complete calendar year | 2019 (8.8%) | 1995 (18.3%) | 1995 (18.3%) |
| Longest underwater (months) | 74 | 13 | 74 |
| Major declines covered | 3 | 3 | 6 |
The columns cover different years, so a higher or lower CAGR is not a verdict on the fund; the point is which market regimes each window includes. Growth of $10,000 is the same one-asset, buy-and-hold calculation the live portfolio app makes.
Growth of $10,000
Drawdowns
How BND did in each major US stock-market decline since 1985
| Decline | S&P 500 | BND over the same months | Source of those months |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1987 crashSep 1987–Nov 1987 | -29.8% | 1.9% | VBMFX |
| 1998 LTCM sell-offJul 1998–Aug 1998 | -15.3% | 2.1% | VBMFX |
| 2000–02 dot-com bearSep 2000–Sep 2002 | -44.7% | 21.3% | VBMFX |
| 2007–09 financial crisisNov 2007–Feb 2009 | -50.8% | 7.0% | ETF |
| 2020 COVID crashJan 2020–Mar 2020 | -19.4% | 2.2% | ETF |
| 2022 inflation bearJan 2022–Sep 2022 | -23.9% | -14.5% | ETF |
The decline windows are computed, not chosen: every peak-to-trough fall of at least 15% (month-end) in the S&P 500 series since 1985. The fund's figure compounds its monthly returns from the month after the S&P 500's peak through the trough.
BND's own five deepest drawdowns (extended history)
| Peak | Trough | Depth | Recovery | Source of the decline months |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2020 | Oct 2022 | -17.3% | not yet recovered | ETF |
| Feb 1987 | Sep 1987 | -5.8% | Jan 1988 | VBMFX |
| Jan 1994 | Jun 1994 | -5.0% | Feb 1995 | VBMFX |
| Apr 2013 | Aug 2013 | -4.0% | May 2014 | ETF |
| Mar 2008 | Oct 2008 | -3.9% | Dec 2008 | ETF |
This covers declines the equity windows miss, such as the bond bear markets of 1994 and 2022.
Caveats
- Before May 2007 the returns are VBMFX's, after that fund's own costs; the measured gap while both existed is -0.10% a year.
- Monthly month-end data: intra-month drawdowns were deeper than shown.
- Dividends are reinvested; no taxes or trading costs are modeled.
- Our data source's series for VBMFX begins Jan 1987; the fund itself may be older.
Test it yourself
Open BND as a one-asset portfolio in the live app, where every number recomputes from fresh data.
Open BND (100%) in the portfolio builder →Used in portfolios: Bogleheads Three-Fund, Betterment Core, Classic Stocks & Bonds 60/40, Conservative Stocks & Bonds 40/60, Core Four, Coffeehouse, No-Brainer
Used in strategies: Dual Momentum (GEM)
Used in guides: Betterment Core, Bogleheads 3-Fund, Coffeehouse, Core Four, No-Brainer
Frequently asked questions
- How far back does BND data go?
- BND (US Total Bond Market) has its own monthly data from May 2007. Spliced with VBMFX it reaches back to Jan 1987, which adds 20.3 years (51% of the extended history comes from proxies). Data through Sep 2026.
- What did BND do before 2007?
- Before May 2007 the series is VBMFX's. Those 20.3 years (Jan 1987–Apr 2007) show 7.0% a year with 4.1% annualized volatility and a worst drawdown of -5.8% (Feb 1987–Sep 1987). In major S&P 500 declines: 1987 crash, 1.9% versus -29.8% for the S&P 500 (VBMFX); 1998 LTCM sell-off, 2.1% versus -15.3% for the S&P 500 (VBMFX); 2000–02 dot-com bear, 21.3% versus -44.7% for the S&P 500 (VBMFX). The full extended history's worst drawdown is -17.3% (Jul 2020–Oct 2022).
- How closely does VBMFX track BND?
- Over 233 overlapping months (May 2007–Sep 2026), VBMFX had a correlation of 0.986 with BND, a tracking error of 0.8% a year and a tracking difference of -0.10% a year (grade: close).
Methodology
- Source
- Yahoo Finance via MarketHeist, monthly adjusted close (dividends reinvested). Months run to the last complete calendar month.
- Splice rule
- Each month uses the youngest fund that has data for it; returns are spliced, not prices (dividends reinvested via adjusted close).
- Numbers
- Computed by the MarketHeist portfolio engine as a one-asset, 100% buy-and-hold portfolio, the same calculation the live app makes. Sharpe uses a risk-free rate of 0%. Drawdowns are month-end.
- Correlation
- Pearson correlation of monthly returns over the months both funds have.
- Tracking error
- Standard deviation of the monthly return differences (proxy minus BND) times the square root of 12.
- Tracking difference
- Annualized geometric return of the proxy minus that of BND over the overlap. Positive means the proxy earned more.
- Beta and vol ratio
- Beta is the covariance of the proxy with BND divided by the variance of BND; vol ratio is the proxy's standard deviation divided by BND's.
- Grades
- Close: correlation of at least 0.95 and tracking error of at most 3%. Approximate: tracking error of at most 8% and either a cash-like fund (volatility of at most 3%) or correlation of at least 0.80 with a vol ratio of at most 1.25. Category stand-in: anything weaker.
- Generated
- 2026-10-10; data through Sep 2026. Reproduce hash of the full extended one-asset portfolio:
18f89ed7bb26aeb3
Historical simulation, not investment advice. Past returns, including spliced proxy returns, do not predict future results.