How far back can you test VEA? To May 1996, with VTMGX and VGTSX
What you'd have missed
- VEA's own data starts in Aug 2007; VTMGX and VGTSX extend it to May 1996, 11.3 more years.
- Its own history misses the 1998 LTCM sell-off and the 2000–02 dot-com bear.
- Its worst drawdown, -57.1% (Oct 2007–Feb 2009), is already inside the ETF's own history; the extension does not change the worst case.
- VEU and VXUS are extended with the same VGTSX.
How the history is built
Solid bars are the months each fund contributes to the spliced series; the outline shows how far a proxy's own data runs. Each month uses the youngest fund that has data for it; returns are spliced, not prices (dividends reinvested via adjusted close).
How well each proxy tracked VEA
| Proxy | Kind | Months contributed | Overlap with VEA | Correlation | Tracking error | Tracking difference | Beta | Vol ratio | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VTMGXVanguard Developed Markets Index Fund | mutual fund | Sep 1999–Jul 200795 months | Aug 2007–Sep 2026230 months | 0.999 | 0.95% | 0.00% | 1.00 | 1.00 | Close |
| VGTSXVanguard Total International Stock Index Fund | mutual fund | May 1996–Aug 199940 months | Aug 2007–Sep 2026230 months | 0.989 | 2.66% | -0.49% | 0.99 | 1.00 | Close |
| ↳ vs VTMGX (the link it is spliced onto) | Sep 1999–Sep 2026325 months | 0.991 | 2.27% | +0.01% | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||
Statistics are over the months a proxy and VEA both have data. Tracking error is annualized; tracking difference is the annualized geometric gap (positive: the proxy earned more). Page grade: close, the worst grade among the proxies that contribute months.
VEA's own history versus the extended history
| The ETF's own history | Proxy years only | Full extended history | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Window | Aug 2007 – Sep 202619.2 years | May 1996 – Jul 200711.3 years | May 1996 – Sep 202630.4 years |
| Growth of $10,000 | $26,265 | $21,904 | $57,531 |
| CAGR | 5.2% | 7.2% | 5.9% |
| Annualized volatility | 17.8% | 14.7% | 16.7% |
| Sharpe ratio (risk-free 0%) | 0.37 | 0.55 | 0.43 |
| Max drawdown | -57.1%Oct 2007 → Feb 2009; recovered May 2014 | -48.2%Dec 1999 → Mar 2003; recovered Sep 2005 | -57.1%Oct 2007 → Feb 2009; recovered May 2014 |
| Worst complete calendar year | 2008 (-40.6%) | 2001 (-21.9%) | 2008 (-40.6%) |
| Best complete calendar year | 2025 (35.2%) | 2003 (38.7%) | 2003 (38.7%) |
| Longest underwater (months) | 78 | 68 | 78 |
| Major declines covered | 3 | 2 | 5 |
The columns cover different years, so a higher or lower CAGR is not a verdict on the fund; the point is which market regimes each window includes. Growth of $10,000 is the same one-asset, buy-and-hold calculation the live portfolio app makes.
Growth of $10,000
Drawdowns
How VEA did in each major US stock-market decline since 1985
| Decline | S&P 500 | VEA over the same months | Source of those months |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1987 crashSep 1987–Nov 1987 | -29.8% | not covered | before available data |
| 1998 LTCM sell-offJul 1998–Aug 1998 | -15.3% | -12.7% | VGTSX |
| 2000–02 dot-com bearSep 2000–Sep 2002 | -44.7% | -42.9% | VTMGX |
| 2007–09 financial crisisNov 2007–Feb 2009 | -50.8% | -57.1% | ETF |
| 2020 COVID crashJan 2020–Mar 2020 | -19.4% | -24.0% | ETF |
| 2022 inflation bearJan 2022–Sep 2022 | -23.9% | -27.5% | ETF |
The decline windows are computed, not chosen: every peak-to-trough fall of at least 15% (month-end) in the S&P 500 series since 1985. The fund's figure compounds its monthly returns from the month after the S&P 500's peak through the trough.
VEA's own five deepest drawdowns (extended history)
| Peak | Trough | Depth | Recovery | Source of the decline months |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2007 | Feb 2009 | -57.1% | May 2014 | ETF |
| Dec 1999 | Mar 2003 | -48.2% | Sep 2005 | VTMGX |
| Aug 2021 | Sep 2022 | -28.1% | Feb 2024 | ETF |
| Jan 2018 | Mar 2020 | -24.1% | Nov 2020 | ETF |
| Jun 2014 | Feb 2016 | -17.9% | Apr 2017 | ETF |
This covers declines the equity windows miss, such as the bond bear markets of 1994 and 2022.
Caveats
- Before Aug 2007 the returns are VTMGX's, after that fund's own costs; the measured gap while both existed is 0.00% a year.
- Before Sep 1999 the returns are VGTSX's, after that fund's own costs; the measured gap while both existed is -0.49% a year.
- Monthly month-end data: intra-month drawdowns were deeper than shown.
- Dividends are reinvested; no taxes or trading costs are modeled.
- Our data source's series for VGTSX begins May 1996; the fund itself may be older.
Test it yourself
Open VEA as a one-asset portfolio in the live app, where every number recomputes from fresh data.
Open VEA (100%) in the portfolio builder →Used in portfolios: Global Asset Allocation, Wealthfront Classic, Betterment Core, Yale Endowment (Swensen), No-Brainer, Larry Portfolio
Used in strategies: Global Tactical Asset Allocation (Aggressive)
Used in guides: Betterment Core, Global Asset Allocation, Larry Portfolio, No-Brainer, Wealthfront Classic, Yale (Swensen)
Frequently asked questions
- How far back does VEA data go?
- VEA (Intl Developed Markets) has its own monthly data from Aug 2007. Spliced with VTMGX and VGTSX it reaches back to May 1996, which adds 11.3 years (37% of the extended history comes from proxies). Data through Sep 2026.
- What did VEA do before 2007?
- Before Aug 2007 the series is VTMGX and VGTSX's. Those 11.3 years (May 1996–Jul 2007) show 7.2% a year with 14.7% annualized volatility and a worst drawdown of -48.2% (Dec 1999–Mar 2003). In major S&P 500 declines: 1998 LTCM sell-off, -12.7% versus -15.3% for the S&P 500 (VGTSX); 2000–02 dot-com bear, -42.9% versus -44.7% for the S&P 500 (VTMGX). The full extended history's worst drawdown is -57.1% (Oct 2007–Feb 2009).
- How closely does VTMGX track VEA?
- Over 230 overlapping months (Aug 2007–Sep 2026), VTMGX had a correlation of 0.999 with VEA, a tracking error of 0.9% a year and a tracking difference of 0.00% a year (grade: close). Over 230 overlapping months (Aug 2007–Sep 2026), VGTSX had a correlation of 0.989 with VEA, a tracking error of 2.7% a year and a tracking difference of -0.49% a year (grade: close).
Methodology
- Source
- Yahoo Finance via MarketHeist, monthly adjusted close (dividends reinvested). Months run to the last complete calendar month.
- Splice rule
- Each month uses the youngest fund that has data for it; returns are spliced, not prices (dividends reinvested via adjusted close).
- Numbers
- Computed by the MarketHeist portfolio engine as a one-asset, 100% buy-and-hold portfolio, the same calculation the live app makes. Sharpe uses a risk-free rate of 0%. Drawdowns are month-end.
- Correlation
- Pearson correlation of monthly returns over the months both funds have.
- Tracking error
- Standard deviation of the monthly return differences (proxy minus VEA) times the square root of 12.
- Tracking difference
- Annualized geometric return of the proxy minus that of VEA over the overlap. Positive means the proxy earned more.
- Beta and vol ratio
- Beta is the covariance of the proxy with VEA divided by the variance of VEA; vol ratio is the proxy's standard deviation divided by VEA's.
- Grades
- Close: correlation of at least 0.95 and tracking error of at most 3%. Approximate: tracking error of at most 8% and either a cash-like fund (volatility of at most 3%) or correlation of at least 0.80 with a vol ratio of at most 1.25. Category stand-in: anything weaker.
- Generated
- 2026-10-10; data through Sep 2026. Reproduce hash of the full extended one-asset portfolio:
a3cb0636acec1ae3
Historical simulation, not investment advice. Past returns, including spliced proxy returns, do not predict future results.